Epistemology of Group Disagreement
portes grátis
Epistemology of Group Disagreement
Broncano-Berrocal, Fernando; Carter, J. Adam
Taylor & Francis Ltd
08/2022
286
Mole
Inglês
9780367652647
15 a 20 dias
390
Descrição não disponível.
1. The Epistemology of Group Disagreement: An Introduction
Fernando Broncano-Berrocal and J. Adam Carter
2. Deliberation and Group Disagreement
Fernando Broncano-Berrocal and J. Adam Carter
3. Disagreement Within Rational Collective Agents
Javier Gonzalez de Prado Salas and Xavier Donato
4. When Conciliation Frustrates the Epistemic Priorities of Groups
Mattias Skipper and Asbjorn Steglich-Petersen
5. Intra-Group Disagreement and Conciliationism
Nathan Sheff
6. Bucking the Trend - The Puzzle of Individual Dissent
Simon Barker
7. Gender and Group Disagreements
Mona Simion and Martin Miragoli
8. Disagreement and Epistemic Injustice from a Communal Perspective
Mikkel Gerken
9. Group Disagreement in Science
Kristina Rolin
10. Disagreement in a Group: Aggregation, Respect for Evidence, and Synergy
Anna-Maria Asunta Eder
11. Why Bayesian Agents Polarize
Erik J. Olsson
12. The Mirage of Individual Disagreement: Groups are all that Stand between Humanity and Epistemic Excellence
Maura Priest
13. A Plea for Complexity: The Normative Assessment of Groups' Responses to Testimony
Nikolaj Nottelmann
Fernando Broncano-Berrocal and J. Adam Carter
2. Deliberation and Group Disagreement
Fernando Broncano-Berrocal and J. Adam Carter
3. Disagreement Within Rational Collective Agents
Javier Gonzalez de Prado Salas and Xavier Donato
4. When Conciliation Frustrates the Epistemic Priorities of Groups
Mattias Skipper and Asbjorn Steglich-Petersen
5. Intra-Group Disagreement and Conciliationism
Nathan Sheff
6. Bucking the Trend - The Puzzle of Individual Dissent
Simon Barker
7. Gender and Group Disagreements
Mona Simion and Martin Miragoli
8. Disagreement and Epistemic Injustice from a Communal Perspective
Mikkel Gerken
9. Group Disagreement in Science
Kristina Rolin
10. Disagreement in a Group: Aggregation, Respect for Evidence, and Synergy
Anna-Maria Asunta Eder
11. Why Bayesian Agents Polarize
Erik J. Olsson
12. The Mirage of Individual Disagreement: Groups are all that Stand between Humanity and Epistemic Excellence
Maura Priest
13. A Plea for Complexity: The Normative Assessment of Groups' Responses to Testimony
Nikolaj Nottelmann
Este título pertence ao(s) assunto(s) indicados(s). Para ver outros títulos clique no assunto desejado.
Epistemic Peers;Epistemic Injustice;J. Adam Carter;Peer Disagreement;Fernando Broncano-Berrocal;Group Belief;Simon Barker;Higher Order Evidence;Anna-Maria Asunta Eder;Testimonial Injustice;Mikkel Gerken;Intragroup Disagreement;Javier Gonzalez de Prado Salas;Epistemic Goals;Xavier Donato;Joint Commitment;Jesus Zamora Bonilla;Longino's Account;Nikolaj Nottelmann;Epistemic Justification;Erik J. Olsson;Scientific Dissent;Maura Priest;Epistemic Costs;Nathan Sheff;Individual Dissent;Asbjorn Steglich-Petersen;Intra-group Disagreements;Mattias Skipper Rasmussen;Epistemic Priorities;Kristina Rolin;Epistemic Evaluation;Mona Simion;Epistemic Status;group disagreement;In-group Disagreement;disagreement;Condorcet's Jury Theorem;group epistemology;Epistemic Responsibility;epistemology of disagreement;Negative Reliability;epistemology of groups;Reasoning Commitments;collective intentionality;EL;collective epistemology;Group Peer Disagreement;social ontology;social epistemology;political epistemology;intra-group disagreement;inter-group disagreement;evidence;aggregation;beliefs;credence;epistemic liberalism;deliberation;collective doxastic agents;belief polarization;polarization;conciliationism;public reason liberalism;Epistemology;Real-life disagreement
1. The Epistemology of Group Disagreement: An Introduction
Fernando Broncano-Berrocal and J. Adam Carter
2. Deliberation and Group Disagreement
Fernando Broncano-Berrocal and J. Adam Carter
3. Disagreement Within Rational Collective Agents
Javier Gonzalez de Prado Salas and Xavier Donato
4. When Conciliation Frustrates the Epistemic Priorities of Groups
Mattias Skipper and Asbjorn Steglich-Petersen
5. Intra-Group Disagreement and Conciliationism
Nathan Sheff
6. Bucking the Trend - The Puzzle of Individual Dissent
Simon Barker
7. Gender and Group Disagreements
Mona Simion and Martin Miragoli
8. Disagreement and Epistemic Injustice from a Communal Perspective
Mikkel Gerken
9. Group Disagreement in Science
Kristina Rolin
10. Disagreement in a Group: Aggregation, Respect for Evidence, and Synergy
Anna-Maria Asunta Eder
11. Why Bayesian Agents Polarize
Erik J. Olsson
12. The Mirage of Individual Disagreement: Groups are all that Stand between Humanity and Epistemic Excellence
Maura Priest
13. A Plea for Complexity: The Normative Assessment of Groups' Responses to Testimony
Nikolaj Nottelmann
Fernando Broncano-Berrocal and J. Adam Carter
2. Deliberation and Group Disagreement
Fernando Broncano-Berrocal and J. Adam Carter
3. Disagreement Within Rational Collective Agents
Javier Gonzalez de Prado Salas and Xavier Donato
4. When Conciliation Frustrates the Epistemic Priorities of Groups
Mattias Skipper and Asbjorn Steglich-Petersen
5. Intra-Group Disagreement and Conciliationism
Nathan Sheff
6. Bucking the Trend - The Puzzle of Individual Dissent
Simon Barker
7. Gender and Group Disagreements
Mona Simion and Martin Miragoli
8. Disagreement and Epistemic Injustice from a Communal Perspective
Mikkel Gerken
9. Group Disagreement in Science
Kristina Rolin
10. Disagreement in a Group: Aggregation, Respect for Evidence, and Synergy
Anna-Maria Asunta Eder
11. Why Bayesian Agents Polarize
Erik J. Olsson
12. The Mirage of Individual Disagreement: Groups are all that Stand between Humanity and Epistemic Excellence
Maura Priest
13. A Plea for Complexity: The Normative Assessment of Groups' Responses to Testimony
Nikolaj Nottelmann
Este título pertence ao(s) assunto(s) indicados(s). Para ver outros títulos clique no assunto desejado.
Epistemic Peers;Epistemic Injustice;J. Adam Carter;Peer Disagreement;Fernando Broncano-Berrocal;Group Belief;Simon Barker;Higher Order Evidence;Anna-Maria Asunta Eder;Testimonial Injustice;Mikkel Gerken;Intragroup Disagreement;Javier Gonzalez de Prado Salas;Epistemic Goals;Xavier Donato;Joint Commitment;Jesus Zamora Bonilla;Longino's Account;Nikolaj Nottelmann;Epistemic Justification;Erik J. Olsson;Scientific Dissent;Maura Priest;Epistemic Costs;Nathan Sheff;Individual Dissent;Asbjorn Steglich-Petersen;Intra-group Disagreements;Mattias Skipper Rasmussen;Epistemic Priorities;Kristina Rolin;Epistemic Evaluation;Mona Simion;Epistemic Status;group disagreement;In-group Disagreement;disagreement;Condorcet's Jury Theorem;group epistemology;Epistemic Responsibility;epistemology of disagreement;Negative Reliability;epistemology of groups;Reasoning Commitments;collective intentionality;EL;collective epistemology;Group Peer Disagreement;social ontology;social epistemology;political epistemology;intra-group disagreement;inter-group disagreement;evidence;aggregation;beliefs;credence;epistemic liberalism;deliberation;collective doxastic agents;belief polarization;polarization;conciliationism;public reason liberalism;Epistemology;Real-life disagreement