Environmental Justice for Climate Refugees
portes grátis
Environmental Justice for Climate Refugees
Rosignoli, Francesca
Taylor & Francis Ltd
05/2022
138
Dura
Inglês
9780367609436
15 a 20 dias
430
Descrição não disponível.
Table of contents
1 'Climate refugees': Towards the construction of a new subjectivity
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Methodology
1.3 Historical knowledge of struggles
1.3.1 The heterogeneity and multi-causality of climate-induced migration: empirical controversies
1.3.2 History of the terminological disputes
1.3.3 Competing for the future: The struggles of policymakers and the shift of nomenclature
1.4. The insurrection of knowledges. Legal categories in motion
1.5. Concluding remarks: Towards a decolonial environmental justice perspective
2. The unresolved legal dispute over the recognition of 'Climate Refugees'
2.1 International Refugee Law. The history of the 1951 Refugee Convention
2.2 Regional Refugee Instruments: OAU Convention and Cartagena Declaration
2.3 Towards the Global Compacts on Refugees and Migration and beyond
2.4 Limits and possibilities of the Refugee Law Concepts
2.5 Looking for alternatives: The role of International human rights law and International environmental law
2.6 Ioane Teitiota v. New Zealand. A legal tipping point?
3. Legal proposals and ongoing initiatives to fill the legal gap
3.1 Three proposals for a new Universal Treaty
3.2 Regional- and local-based proposals: regional responses, bilateral agreements, or enhanced domestic immigration laws? The case of Finland, Sweden, and Italy
3.3 Beyond silos: connecting different international law regimes
3.4 Just a matter of extension?
3.5 Combining existing legal framework with new multilateral treaty and complementary measures
3.6 Nansen Initiative
3.7 Peninsula Principles
3.8 Migration with dignity
4. The justice dilemma. 'Climate Refugees' as a case of Environmental (in)Justice
4.1 What (Decolonial) Environmental Justice is and Why it matters for 'Climate Refugees'
4.2 The Threefold Injustice of 'Climate Refugees': Coloniality of Power, Knowledge, and Being
4.2.1 The Coloniality of Power
4.2.2 The Coloniality of Knowledge
4.2.3 The Coloniality of Being
4.3 Decolonizing the refugeehood
4.4 Concluding remarks
5. Environmental justice for 'Climate Refugees': actors, instruments, and strategies
5.1Why non-state actors can 'solve' the justice dilemma
5.2 A toolkit for non-state actors: collective capabilities
5.3 Limitations and ways forward
5.4 Conclusion
Acknowledgements
End matter
Index
1 'Climate refugees': Towards the construction of a new subjectivity
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Methodology
1.3 Historical knowledge of struggles
1.3.1 The heterogeneity and multi-causality of climate-induced migration: empirical controversies
1.3.2 History of the terminological disputes
1.3.3 Competing for the future: The struggles of policymakers and the shift of nomenclature
1.4. The insurrection of knowledges. Legal categories in motion
1.5. Concluding remarks: Towards a decolonial environmental justice perspective
2. The unresolved legal dispute over the recognition of 'Climate Refugees'
2.1 International Refugee Law. The history of the 1951 Refugee Convention
2.2 Regional Refugee Instruments: OAU Convention and Cartagena Declaration
2.3 Towards the Global Compacts on Refugees and Migration and beyond
2.4 Limits and possibilities of the Refugee Law Concepts
2.5 Looking for alternatives: The role of International human rights law and International environmental law
2.6 Ioane Teitiota v. New Zealand. A legal tipping point?
3. Legal proposals and ongoing initiatives to fill the legal gap
3.1 Three proposals for a new Universal Treaty
3.2 Regional- and local-based proposals: regional responses, bilateral agreements, or enhanced domestic immigration laws? The case of Finland, Sweden, and Italy
3.3 Beyond silos: connecting different international law regimes
3.4 Just a matter of extension?
3.5 Combining existing legal framework with new multilateral treaty and complementary measures
3.6 Nansen Initiative
3.7 Peninsula Principles
3.8 Migration with dignity
4. The justice dilemma. 'Climate Refugees' as a case of Environmental (in)Justice
4.1 What (Decolonial) Environmental Justice is and Why it matters for 'Climate Refugees'
4.2 The Threefold Injustice of 'Climate Refugees': Coloniality of Power, Knowledge, and Being
4.2.1 The Coloniality of Power
4.2.2 The Coloniality of Knowledge
4.2.3 The Coloniality of Being
4.3 Decolonizing the refugeehood
4.4 Concluding remarks
5. Environmental justice for 'Climate Refugees': actors, instruments, and strategies
5.1Why non-state actors can 'solve' the justice dilemma
5.2 A toolkit for non-state actors: collective capabilities
5.3 Limitations and ways forward
5.4 Conclusion
Acknowledgements
End matter
Index
Este título pertence ao(s) assunto(s) indicados(s). Para ver outros títulos clique no assunto desejado.
Climate Refugees;Environmental Justice;Environmental displacement;climate change;environmental migration;Internally Displaced;Nansen Initiative;Peninsula Principles;Climate Displaced;Climate Migration;Disaster Displacement;International Refugee Law;WIM;Slow Onset Events;OAU Convention;Refugee Definition;Climate Change Refugees;Environmental Migrants;IEL;Non-refoulement Principle;International Humanitarian Law;Climate Change Litigation;Climate Change Displaced;International Refugee Protection;Paris Agreement;Non-state Actors;Global Compact;Humanitarian Protection
Table of contents
1 'Climate refugees': Towards the construction of a new subjectivity
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Methodology
1.3 Historical knowledge of struggles
1.3.1 The heterogeneity and multi-causality of climate-induced migration: empirical controversies
1.3.2 History of the terminological disputes
1.3.3 Competing for the future: The struggles of policymakers and the shift of nomenclature
1.4. The insurrection of knowledges. Legal categories in motion
1.5. Concluding remarks: Towards a decolonial environmental justice perspective
2. The unresolved legal dispute over the recognition of 'Climate Refugees'
2.1 International Refugee Law. The history of the 1951 Refugee Convention
2.2 Regional Refugee Instruments: OAU Convention and Cartagena Declaration
2.3 Towards the Global Compacts on Refugees and Migration and beyond
2.4 Limits and possibilities of the Refugee Law Concepts
2.5 Looking for alternatives: The role of International human rights law and International environmental law
2.6 Ioane Teitiota v. New Zealand. A legal tipping point?
3. Legal proposals and ongoing initiatives to fill the legal gap
3.1 Three proposals for a new Universal Treaty
3.2 Regional- and local-based proposals: regional responses, bilateral agreements, or enhanced domestic immigration laws? The case of Finland, Sweden, and Italy
3.3 Beyond silos: connecting different international law regimes
3.4 Just a matter of extension?
3.5 Combining existing legal framework with new multilateral treaty and complementary measures
3.6 Nansen Initiative
3.7 Peninsula Principles
3.8 Migration with dignity
4. The justice dilemma. 'Climate Refugees' as a case of Environmental (in)Justice
4.1 What (Decolonial) Environmental Justice is and Why it matters for 'Climate Refugees'
4.2 The Threefold Injustice of 'Climate Refugees': Coloniality of Power, Knowledge, and Being
4.2.1 The Coloniality of Power
4.2.2 The Coloniality of Knowledge
4.2.3 The Coloniality of Being
4.3 Decolonizing the refugeehood
4.4 Concluding remarks
5. Environmental justice for 'Climate Refugees': actors, instruments, and strategies
5.1Why non-state actors can 'solve' the justice dilemma
5.2 A toolkit for non-state actors: collective capabilities
5.3 Limitations and ways forward
5.4 Conclusion
Acknowledgements
End matter
Index
1 'Climate refugees': Towards the construction of a new subjectivity
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Methodology
1.3 Historical knowledge of struggles
1.3.1 The heterogeneity and multi-causality of climate-induced migration: empirical controversies
1.3.2 History of the terminological disputes
1.3.3 Competing for the future: The struggles of policymakers and the shift of nomenclature
1.4. The insurrection of knowledges. Legal categories in motion
1.5. Concluding remarks: Towards a decolonial environmental justice perspective
2. The unresolved legal dispute over the recognition of 'Climate Refugees'
2.1 International Refugee Law. The history of the 1951 Refugee Convention
2.2 Regional Refugee Instruments: OAU Convention and Cartagena Declaration
2.3 Towards the Global Compacts on Refugees and Migration and beyond
2.4 Limits and possibilities of the Refugee Law Concepts
2.5 Looking for alternatives: The role of International human rights law and International environmental law
2.6 Ioane Teitiota v. New Zealand. A legal tipping point?
3. Legal proposals and ongoing initiatives to fill the legal gap
3.1 Three proposals for a new Universal Treaty
3.2 Regional- and local-based proposals: regional responses, bilateral agreements, or enhanced domestic immigration laws? The case of Finland, Sweden, and Italy
3.3 Beyond silos: connecting different international law regimes
3.4 Just a matter of extension?
3.5 Combining existing legal framework with new multilateral treaty and complementary measures
3.6 Nansen Initiative
3.7 Peninsula Principles
3.8 Migration with dignity
4. The justice dilemma. 'Climate Refugees' as a case of Environmental (in)Justice
4.1 What (Decolonial) Environmental Justice is and Why it matters for 'Climate Refugees'
4.2 The Threefold Injustice of 'Climate Refugees': Coloniality of Power, Knowledge, and Being
4.2.1 The Coloniality of Power
4.2.2 The Coloniality of Knowledge
4.2.3 The Coloniality of Being
4.3 Decolonizing the refugeehood
4.4 Concluding remarks
5. Environmental justice for 'Climate Refugees': actors, instruments, and strategies
5.1Why non-state actors can 'solve' the justice dilemma
5.2 A toolkit for non-state actors: collective capabilities
5.3 Limitations and ways forward
5.4 Conclusion
Acknowledgements
End matter
Index
Este título pertence ao(s) assunto(s) indicados(s). Para ver outros títulos clique no assunto desejado.
Climate Refugees;Environmental Justice;Environmental displacement;climate change;environmental migration;Internally Displaced;Nansen Initiative;Peninsula Principles;Climate Displaced;Climate Migration;Disaster Displacement;International Refugee Law;WIM;Slow Onset Events;OAU Convention;Refugee Definition;Climate Change Refugees;Environmental Migrants;IEL;Non-refoulement Principle;International Humanitarian Law;Climate Change Litigation;Climate Change Displaced;International Refugee Protection;Paris Agreement;Non-state Actors;Global Compact;Humanitarian Protection
