Drug Legalization in Federalist Constitutional Democracies
portes grátis
Drug Legalization in Federalist Constitutional Democracies
The Canadian Cannabis Case Study in Comparative Context
Alati, Daniel
Taylor & Francis Ltd
09/2022
200
Dura
Inglês
9781032061092
15 a 20 dias
548
Descrição não disponível.
1 Introduction 1.1 Aims and Objectives 1.2 Methodology 1.3 Chapter Summaries 2 Historical Evolution of Canada's Federal Drug Policy 2.1 The Passage of the Opium Act and the Beginning of Prohibition 2.2 The LeDain Commission Inquiry and Subsequent Political Indifference 2.3 "The War on Drugs" and the Passage of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act 2.4 The Turn of the Century: A Return to Drug Policy Reform Inertia 2.5 The Turn of the Century: Legal Challenges Prompt Changes to Medical Cannabis Regulation 2.6 The Passage of the 2018 Cannabis Act: A Missed Opportunity 2.7 Voices From the Front Lines: Indigenous Community and Cannabis Industry Leaders Echo Academic Concerns 2.8 Conclusion 3 Provincial Implementation of Cannabis Legalization 3.1 Federalism Issues: Cooperation or Unilateralism? 3.2 Federalism Issues: Further Exclusion of Indigenous Participation 3.3 Broad Trends and Issues Associated with Provincial Implementation 3.4 Provincial Implementation of Cannabis Legalization in Ontario 3.5 Provincial Implementation of Cannabis Legalization in Alberta 3.6 Provincial Implementation of Cannabis Legalization in Quebec 3.7 Provincial Implementation of Cannabis Legalization in British Columbia 3.8 Provincial Implementation of Cannabis Legalization in Saskatchewan 3.9 Provincial Implementation of Cannabis Legalization in Manitoba 3.10 Provincial Implementation of Cannabis Legalization in Canada's Eastern Provinces 3.11 Conclusion: Is a Course Correction Necessary? 4 Status of Drug Legalization in Other Federalist Constitutional Democracies 4.1 Commonwealth Jurisdictions 4.1.1 Australia 4.1.2 Jamaica 4.1.3 New Zealand 4.1.4 South Africa 4.1.5 United Kingdom 4.2 European Countries 4.2.1 Czech Republic 4.2.2 Germany 4.2.3 Italy 4.2.4 Malta 4.2.5 Netherlands 4.2.6 Portugal 4.2.7 Spain 4.2.8 Switzerland 4.3 Latin America 4.3.1 Argentina 4.3.2 Brazil 4.3.3 Chile 4.3.4 Columbia 4.3.5 Costa Rica 4.3.6 Mexico 4.3.7 Paraguay 4.3.8 Peru 4.3.9 Uruguay4.4 United States4.4.1 Alaska4.4.2 Arizona 4.4.3 California 4.4.4 Colorado4.4.5 Connecticut 4.4.6 Illinois 4.4.7 Maine 4.4.8 Massachusetts 4.4.9 Michigan 4.4.10 Montana 4.4.11 Nevada4.4.12 New Jersey 4.4.13 New Mexico 4.4.14 New York 4.4.15 Oregon 4.4.16 Vermont 4.4.17 Virginia 4.4.18 Washington State4.5 Conclusion 5 Lessons Learned and Future Challenges 5.1 Lessons Learned: Indigenous Exclusion Must Be Addressed 5.2 Lessons Learned: Time to Write a New Chapter in Canada's Racist Drug History 5.3 Lessons Learned from Abroad: Other Jurisdictions Have Done More to Promote Social Equity, Broader Drug Policy Liberalization, and Harm Reduction Approaches 5.4 Future Challenges: The Government Should Listen to the "Voices" of its Industry 5.4.1 Future Challenges: Changes to the Excise Tax and Related Issues 5.4.2 Future Challenges: The Inadequacy of Health Canada Must Be Addressed 5.4.3 Future Challenges: Marketing and Advertising Restrictions Need to Be Relaxed 5.4.4 Future Challenges: The Issue of Market Concentration 5.4.5 Future Challenges: The Regulation of Consumption Lounges 5.4.6 Future Challenges: The Need for More Transparent Data 5.5 Conclusion: Where to Begin? 6 Conclusion 6.1 Recommendations for Future Change to Cannabis (and Wider Drug) Policy in Canada 6.2 Looking Towards the Future: Directions for Future Research
Este título pertence ao(s) assunto(s) indicados(s). Para ver outros títulos clique no assunto desejado.
Drug policy;marginalization;stigmatization;federalism;constitutional law;comparative law;criminal justice;Indigenous self-governance;Canada;United Kingdom;United States;Australia;Cannabis Legalization;Cannabis Industry;THC Content;Cannabis Act;Medical Cannabis;Drug Policy Reform;Medical Cannabis Legalization;Wider Drug;Provincial Implementation;Medical Cannabis Users;Indigenous Exclusion;Cannabis Possession;Statutory Review;Cannabis Market;Recreational Cannabis;SAB Miller;Narcotic Drug Act;Cannabis Law Reform;Cannabis Policy;Scottish National Party;Narcotic Control Act;Drug Prohibition;Harm Reduction Measures;Treating Drug Addiction
1 Introduction 1.1 Aims and Objectives 1.2 Methodology 1.3 Chapter Summaries 2 Historical Evolution of Canada's Federal Drug Policy 2.1 The Passage of the Opium Act and the Beginning of Prohibition 2.2 The LeDain Commission Inquiry and Subsequent Political Indifference 2.3 "The War on Drugs" and the Passage of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act 2.4 The Turn of the Century: A Return to Drug Policy Reform Inertia 2.5 The Turn of the Century: Legal Challenges Prompt Changes to Medical Cannabis Regulation 2.6 The Passage of the 2018 Cannabis Act: A Missed Opportunity 2.7 Voices From the Front Lines: Indigenous Community and Cannabis Industry Leaders Echo Academic Concerns 2.8 Conclusion 3 Provincial Implementation of Cannabis Legalization 3.1 Federalism Issues: Cooperation or Unilateralism? 3.2 Federalism Issues: Further Exclusion of Indigenous Participation 3.3 Broad Trends and Issues Associated with Provincial Implementation 3.4 Provincial Implementation of Cannabis Legalization in Ontario 3.5 Provincial Implementation of Cannabis Legalization in Alberta 3.6 Provincial Implementation of Cannabis Legalization in Quebec 3.7 Provincial Implementation of Cannabis Legalization in British Columbia 3.8 Provincial Implementation of Cannabis Legalization in Saskatchewan 3.9 Provincial Implementation of Cannabis Legalization in Manitoba 3.10 Provincial Implementation of Cannabis Legalization in Canada's Eastern Provinces 3.11 Conclusion: Is a Course Correction Necessary? 4 Status of Drug Legalization in Other Federalist Constitutional Democracies 4.1 Commonwealth Jurisdictions 4.1.1 Australia 4.1.2 Jamaica 4.1.3 New Zealand 4.1.4 South Africa 4.1.5 United Kingdom 4.2 European Countries 4.2.1 Czech Republic 4.2.2 Germany 4.2.3 Italy 4.2.4 Malta 4.2.5 Netherlands 4.2.6 Portugal 4.2.7 Spain 4.2.8 Switzerland 4.3 Latin America 4.3.1 Argentina 4.3.2 Brazil 4.3.3 Chile 4.3.4 Columbia 4.3.5 Costa Rica 4.3.6 Mexico 4.3.7 Paraguay 4.3.8 Peru 4.3.9 Uruguay4.4 United States4.4.1 Alaska4.4.2 Arizona 4.4.3 California 4.4.4 Colorado4.4.5 Connecticut 4.4.6 Illinois 4.4.7 Maine 4.4.8 Massachusetts 4.4.9 Michigan 4.4.10 Montana 4.4.11 Nevada4.4.12 New Jersey 4.4.13 New Mexico 4.4.14 New York 4.4.15 Oregon 4.4.16 Vermont 4.4.17 Virginia 4.4.18 Washington State4.5 Conclusion 5 Lessons Learned and Future Challenges 5.1 Lessons Learned: Indigenous Exclusion Must Be Addressed 5.2 Lessons Learned: Time to Write a New Chapter in Canada's Racist Drug History 5.3 Lessons Learned from Abroad: Other Jurisdictions Have Done More to Promote Social Equity, Broader Drug Policy Liberalization, and Harm Reduction Approaches 5.4 Future Challenges: The Government Should Listen to the "Voices" of its Industry 5.4.1 Future Challenges: Changes to the Excise Tax and Related Issues 5.4.2 Future Challenges: The Inadequacy of Health Canada Must Be Addressed 5.4.3 Future Challenges: Marketing and Advertising Restrictions Need to Be Relaxed 5.4.4 Future Challenges: The Issue of Market Concentration 5.4.5 Future Challenges: The Regulation of Consumption Lounges 5.4.6 Future Challenges: The Need for More Transparent Data 5.5 Conclusion: Where to Begin? 6 Conclusion 6.1 Recommendations for Future Change to Cannabis (and Wider Drug) Policy in Canada 6.2 Looking Towards the Future: Directions for Future Research
Este título pertence ao(s) assunto(s) indicados(s). Para ver outros títulos clique no assunto desejado.
Drug policy;marginalization;stigmatization;federalism;constitutional law;comparative law;criminal justice;Indigenous self-governance;Canada;United Kingdom;United States;Australia;Cannabis Legalization;Cannabis Industry;THC Content;Cannabis Act;Medical Cannabis;Drug Policy Reform;Medical Cannabis Legalization;Wider Drug;Provincial Implementation;Medical Cannabis Users;Indigenous Exclusion;Cannabis Possession;Statutory Review;Cannabis Market;Recreational Cannabis;SAB Miller;Narcotic Drug Act;Cannabis Law Reform;Cannabis Policy;Scottish National Party;Narcotic Control Act;Drug Prohibition;Harm Reduction Measures;Treating Drug Addiction
