Artificial Intelligence's Impact on Legal Journals / Incidence de l'intelligence artificielle sur les revues de droit
portes grátis
Artificial Intelligence's Impact on Legal Journals / Incidence de l'intelligence artificielle sur les revues de droit
Challenges and Opportunities for the Ottawa Law Review / Defis et possibilites pour la Revue de droit d'Ottawa
Campagnolo, Yan
University of Ottawa Press
03/2025
128
Mole
9780776645247
Pré-lançamento - envio 15 a 20 dias após a sua edição
Descrição não disponível.
1. Introduction
1.1. AI and Generative AI
1.2. Increasing Role of AI in Legal Scholarship
1.3. Importance of Understanding AI's Impact on Legal Journals
1.4. Objectives of the Report
2. How Journals Are Responding to AI
2.1. Legal Journals
2.2. Non-Legal Journals
3. Challenges
3.1. Accuracy and Quality Considerations
3.1.1. Bias and Fairness in AI Algorithms
3.1.2. Hallucination of Facts and Sources
3.1.3. Transparency
3.2. Legal Issues
3.2.1. Privacy Concerns
3.2.2. Intellectual Property Implications
4. Opportunities
4.1. Legal Journals Using AI Tools Internally
4.1.1. Review Process
4.1.1.1. Reviewing Submissions
4.1.1.2 . Detecting the Use of AI
4.1.2. Editorial Process
4.1.2.1. Editing Footnotes
4.1.2.2. Editing Article Text for Syntax or Grammar
4.1.3. Publishing Process
4.2. External Parties Using AI Tools
4.2.1. Literature Review, Drafting, and Analysis
4.2.2. AI Legal Writing Tools
5. Recommendations
5.1. Internal Use of AI Tools
5.1.1. Review Process
5.1.2. Modernizing the Editorial Process
5.1.3. Translation Services
5.1.4. Monitoring Legal Developments
5.1.5. Develop OLR AI Tool
5.2. External Use of AI Tools
5.2.1. Authors
5.2.2. Peer Reviewers
6. Conclusion
7. Appendices
Appendix A: Policy on the Use of Generative AI in the OLR Submission Process
Appendix B: Policy Prohibiting the Use of AI in the OLR Peer Review Process
Appendix C: Policy on the Use of AI in the OLR Editing Process
8. References
9. Acknowledgements
1.1. AI and Generative AI
1.2. Increasing Role of AI in Legal Scholarship
1.3. Importance of Understanding AI's Impact on Legal Journals
1.4. Objectives of the Report
2. How Journals Are Responding to AI
2.1. Legal Journals
2.2. Non-Legal Journals
3. Challenges
3.1. Accuracy and Quality Considerations
3.1.1. Bias and Fairness in AI Algorithms
3.1.2. Hallucination of Facts and Sources
3.1.3. Transparency
3.2. Legal Issues
3.2.1. Privacy Concerns
3.2.2. Intellectual Property Implications
4. Opportunities
4.1. Legal Journals Using AI Tools Internally
4.1.1. Review Process
4.1.1.1. Reviewing Submissions
4.1.1.2 . Detecting the Use of AI
4.1.2. Editorial Process
4.1.2.1. Editing Footnotes
4.1.2.2. Editing Article Text for Syntax or Grammar
4.1.3. Publishing Process
4.2. External Parties Using AI Tools
4.2.1. Literature Review, Drafting, and Analysis
4.2.2. AI Legal Writing Tools
5. Recommendations
5.1. Internal Use of AI Tools
5.1.1. Review Process
5.1.2. Modernizing the Editorial Process
5.1.3. Translation Services
5.1.4. Monitoring Legal Developments
5.1.5. Develop OLR AI Tool
5.2. External Use of AI Tools
5.2.1. Authors
5.2.2. Peer Reviewers
6. Conclusion
7. Appendices
Appendix A: Policy on the Use of Generative AI in the OLR Submission Process
Appendix B: Policy Prohibiting the Use of AI in the OLR Peer Review Process
Appendix C: Policy on the Use of AI in the OLR Editing Process
8. References
9. Acknowledgements
Este título pertence ao(s) assunto(s) indicados(s). Para ver outros títulos clique no assunto desejado.
AI; IA; Algorithms; Algorithmes; Legal research; Recherche juridique; Legal writing; Redaction juridique; Digital tools; Outils numeriques; Intellectual property; Propriete intellectuelle; Copyright; Droits d'auteur; Academic journal; Revue scientifique
1. Introduction
1.1. AI and Generative AI
1.2. Increasing Role of AI in Legal Scholarship
1.3. Importance of Understanding AI's Impact on Legal Journals
1.4. Objectives of the Report
2. How Journals Are Responding to AI
2.1. Legal Journals
2.2. Non-Legal Journals
3. Challenges
3.1. Accuracy and Quality Considerations
3.1.1. Bias and Fairness in AI Algorithms
3.1.2. Hallucination of Facts and Sources
3.1.3. Transparency
3.2. Legal Issues
3.2.1. Privacy Concerns
3.2.2. Intellectual Property Implications
4. Opportunities
4.1. Legal Journals Using AI Tools Internally
4.1.1. Review Process
4.1.1.1. Reviewing Submissions
4.1.1.2 . Detecting the Use of AI
4.1.2. Editorial Process
4.1.2.1. Editing Footnotes
4.1.2.2. Editing Article Text for Syntax or Grammar
4.1.3. Publishing Process
4.2. External Parties Using AI Tools
4.2.1. Literature Review, Drafting, and Analysis
4.2.2. AI Legal Writing Tools
5. Recommendations
5.1. Internal Use of AI Tools
5.1.1. Review Process
5.1.2. Modernizing the Editorial Process
5.1.3. Translation Services
5.1.4. Monitoring Legal Developments
5.1.5. Develop OLR AI Tool
5.2. External Use of AI Tools
5.2.1. Authors
5.2.2. Peer Reviewers
6. Conclusion
7. Appendices
Appendix A: Policy on the Use of Generative AI in the OLR Submission Process
Appendix B: Policy Prohibiting the Use of AI in the OLR Peer Review Process
Appendix C: Policy on the Use of AI in the OLR Editing Process
8. References
9. Acknowledgements
1.1. AI and Generative AI
1.2. Increasing Role of AI in Legal Scholarship
1.3. Importance of Understanding AI's Impact on Legal Journals
1.4. Objectives of the Report
2. How Journals Are Responding to AI
2.1. Legal Journals
2.2. Non-Legal Journals
3. Challenges
3.1. Accuracy and Quality Considerations
3.1.1. Bias and Fairness in AI Algorithms
3.1.2. Hallucination of Facts and Sources
3.1.3. Transparency
3.2. Legal Issues
3.2.1. Privacy Concerns
3.2.2. Intellectual Property Implications
4. Opportunities
4.1. Legal Journals Using AI Tools Internally
4.1.1. Review Process
4.1.1.1. Reviewing Submissions
4.1.1.2 . Detecting the Use of AI
4.1.2. Editorial Process
4.1.2.1. Editing Footnotes
4.1.2.2. Editing Article Text for Syntax or Grammar
4.1.3. Publishing Process
4.2. External Parties Using AI Tools
4.2.1. Literature Review, Drafting, and Analysis
4.2.2. AI Legal Writing Tools
5. Recommendations
5.1. Internal Use of AI Tools
5.1.1. Review Process
5.1.2. Modernizing the Editorial Process
5.1.3. Translation Services
5.1.4. Monitoring Legal Developments
5.1.5. Develop OLR AI Tool
5.2. External Use of AI Tools
5.2.1. Authors
5.2.2. Peer Reviewers
6. Conclusion
7. Appendices
Appendix A: Policy on the Use of Generative AI in the OLR Submission Process
Appendix B: Policy Prohibiting the Use of AI in the OLR Peer Review Process
Appendix C: Policy on the Use of AI in the OLR Editing Process
8. References
9. Acknowledgements
Este título pertence ao(s) assunto(s) indicados(s). Para ver outros títulos clique no assunto desejado.
